Search for: "State v. Unis" Results 141 - 160 of 202
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2011, 4:32 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
App That Snaps Their Photos" http://j.mp/oAvWk0 from the wall street journal law blog: "Status Updates Lead To Real-Life Arrests" http://j.mp/qre5t5 "A Citizen's Guide to Reporting on #OccupyWallStreet" from @citmedialaw http://j.mp/pxnDNG another reality tv lawsuit: "Jury to Decide Whether 'So You Think You Can Dance' Was Stolen From Dance Instructor" http://j.mp/nU68pr a fun story from the australian: "How the full-on f-word just slipped… [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:03 pm
However, today's decision in Case T-526/09 PAKI Logistics GmbH v OHIM; soutenu par Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne et d’Irlande du Nord -- available only in French and German so far -- has drummed up a lot of activity in the general vicinity of the Kat's email in-box, spearheaded by the articulate and erudite Simon Malynicz (3 New Square) who appeared for the Royaume-Uni [Merpel explains: the United Kingdom has been rebranded… [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:16 pm by Sandy Levinson
The answer, as Daniel Okrent explains in his marvelous book on the 18th Amendment and its aftermath, Last Call, is "the brilliant tactician who dominated the Anti-Saloon League" and "was considered--by a critic--'the most masterful and powerful single individual in the Unied States,' who 'controlled six Congresses, dictated to two Presidents [and] held the balance of power in both Republican and Democratic parties. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 4:00 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
" Unis reject state role in TEQSA" http://j.mp/ep7u2W this could be cool ... [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
TREATY ON EXTRADITION BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND CANADA TRAITE D’EXTRADITION ENTRE LES ETATS-UNIS D’AMERIQUE ET LE CANADA TEXT: BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A PROCLAMATION CONSIDERING THAT: The Treaty on Extradition between the United States of America and Canada was signed at Washington on December 3, 1971, as amended by an exchange of notes on June 28 and July 9, 1974, the original of which Treaty, as amended,… [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:04 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Haddock, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 303 (07 February 2011) M, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 648 (18 March 2011) Takkar v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 646 (18 March 2011) Attorney Generals Reference No. 73, 75 & 03 of 2010 [2011] EWCA Crim 633 (03 March 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Tradegro (UK) Ltd v Wigmore Street Investments Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 268 (16 March 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Stevenson &… [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 8:54 am by Bartolus
50/00 P Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v Council [2002] ECR I? [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:59 am by Marty Schwimmer
During discovery, plaintiff delivers uni-lateral covenant not to sue, stating that because defendant's actions 'no longer infringe or dilute at a level sufficient to warrant' continued litigation, plaintiff 'unconditionally and irrevocably' covenants not to sue defendant on claims arising from defendant's current and/or previous footwear product designs or 'colorable imitations' thereof. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:16 am by Gilles Cuniberti
On December 22nd, the European Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Joseba Andoni Aguirre Zarraga v. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 9:51 pm by Julian Ku
  (full text of this available at:http://www.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/ifhv/documents/huvi/huv_2006/3_2006.pdfRelevant pages are pp. 91-98). 2. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 12:02 am by Gilles Cuniberti
Defined as a temporary measure, the pre-juridical decision of embargo, adopted as by UNI, as unilaterally, as by regional organizations, ended as soon as the infractions of a State have been finished, in period of armed or post-conflict, in the only goal to end the violation of the international legality. [read post]
25 May 2010, 7:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Their application (09A1133) in McComish, et al., v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:02 am by Andrew J. Batog
Ius de non evocando As the court in Pinochet notes with respect to crimes against the law of nations, there is a duty incumbent upon any potential forum state to defer to the proceedings of an international court or a court in a state which would otherwise have jurisdiction.[7] “Without question, the intervening entity or state must exercise great caution before concluding that intervention is necessary… …the emphasis must remain on… [read post]