Search for: "Steel v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,282
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
However, the former chief executive of British Steel, Ron Deelan, has stated that the mine is “completely unnecessary” because enough coal is available on the free market, and that investment in greener sources such as electric arc furnaces and hydrogen would be more beneficial for the energy industry. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:40 pm
President Truman used the exigencies of the Korean War as justification to seize control of the steel industries during a strike in 1952, which the Supreme Court struck down in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:09 am
When accidents happen, employees and their loved ones may have legal claims under the state workers’ compensation laws of Indiana and Illinois law. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 7:46 am
White v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:44 pm
In Kodiak Building Partners, LLC v Adams, C.A. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 11:03 am
As background, Kodiak operated four business lines in 81 locations and 16 states: (i) lumber and building materials which, depending on the location, may include roof trusses; (ii) gypsum, including drywall and related supplies; (iii) construction supplies, primarily steel, rebar and structural steel, and (iv) kitchen interiors, such as kitchen appliances, flooring, cabinets and countertops. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
In caselaw, lawyers and historians can rely on new historical evidence to challenge previous rulings, as the Organization for Americans Historians did in Obergefell v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 5:57 am
Moore and Michalyn Steele Brigham Young University – J. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm
Region, 558 U.S. 67, 81 (2009) (quoting United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 2:54 pm
” Mistler v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 10:34 am
Federalist Society Luncheon Debate: Resolved: The Major Questions Doctrine Has No Place in Statutory Interpretation Thursday, January 6, noon-1PM In West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 9:28 am
” Lapham-Hickey Steel v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 7:11 am
Bethlehem Steel Corp., 622 F.2d 43 (2d Cir. 1980), which I cite regularly. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:33 pm
From Singh v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 7:12 am
In White v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 10:30 pm
Williams v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 12:01 am
The United Steel Workers of America threatened a strike at that very time, which would have imperiled steel production at a time when nearly all military weapons required steel. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm
Being so misconceived, the court stated that the objection lacked merit and was thus dismissed. [read post]