Search for: "Stevens v Brown" Results 141 - 160 of 734
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan—esp. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Progressive law school opinion has never made its peace with Milliken v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 3:20 pm
This provides new and never before published evidence of why Brown v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:12 am
There is a cruel irony in THE CHIEF JUSTICE.s reliance on our decision in Brown v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:18 pm by Ken
However, rather than pollute Patrick’s thoughtful piece about art and taste with my banal legalities, I’ve decided to blog separately about Brown v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 12:21 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Steven Greenhut's op-ed in the Orange County Register "California GOP the party of numbskulls" about California Governor Jerry Brown's (now failed) proposal to eliminate redevelopment agencies, and how "[s]ome Republicans sided with redevelopment because of their support for some favored local development projects. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm by ernst
The exhibit is free and open to the public.Congratulations to Steven Brown, Auburn University, for wining the Hughes-Gossett Senior Prize for the best article in the Journal of Supreme Court History. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm by Patrick
It won’t surprise long-time readers to learn that I approve of Justice Scalia’s majority opinion in Brown v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
Next is Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:13 am by Andrew Hamm
At The Economist, Steven Mazie provides commentary on the Affordable Care Act at the Supreme Court more generally. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:52 am by Gene Quinn
The Court consolidated Brown with four other cases, collectively referring to all five cases under the name of Brown v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 5:06 am
Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 750-51 (1983) (Stevens, J., concurring in the judgment), because the "distinctive configuration of [such] container[s] proclaims [their] contents; [consequently,] the contents cannot fairly be said to have been removed from a searching officer's view," Robbins, 453 U.S. at 427. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:59 pm by Bona Law PC
New Classic Cases – Brown Shoe One of the most important classic antitrust case is Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:28 am by Michael Dorf
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University. [read post]