Search for: "Strand v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2017, 6:56 am
Most would find it difficult unravel the distinct strands of law in the United States, each of which deeply embedded within their own internally coherent systems of generation, interpretation and application. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:45 am
Direct Command --Constitution of the United States Article I, V --Notes and Questions --b. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 7:12 am
The states of Washington and Minnesota brought a legal challenge to Executive Order 13769, “Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States,” which imposed a 90-day ban on the entry into the United States of aliens from seven primarily Muslim countries. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:46 am
Most would find it difficult unravel the distinct strands of law in the United States, each of which deeply embedded within their own internally coherent systems of generation, interpretation and application. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 7:03 am
State --Akande v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:20 am
See, for example, Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v United States, 491 U.S. 617, 623 n. 3, 109 S Ct 2646, 105 L. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 7:45 am
Most would find it difficult unravel the distinct strands of law in the United States, each of which deeply embedded within their own internally coherent systems of generation, interpretation and application. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 5:08 pm
The order of Judge James Robart in Washington v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:26 am
Quinta Jurecic posted the Lawfare Podcast: Goldsmith v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 2:20 pm
On January, 2016, Judge Strand, the federal district court judge assigned to this case, decided that the Iowa Supreme Court was best positioned to answer the important issues of state law raised by the second category of claims. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 2:20 pm
On January, 2016, Judge Strand, the federal district court judge assigned to this case, decided that the Iowa Supreme Court was best positioned to answer the important issues of state law raised by the second category of claims. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 6:00 am
Hearstand Yakus v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 10:51 am
United States, 320 F.2d 345 (Ct. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 4:41 pm
United Kingdom, the workplace surveillance was predicated upon suspicions of criminal activity, and in Copland v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
United States EPA, 2015 U.S. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
United States EPA, 2015 U.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10 Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:00 am
Instead, securities law serves as a backdrop for debates over statutory interpretation, the use of legislative history, and the relationship of the judiciary to the administrative state. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
It is the face of Dred Scott v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:00 am
–Andrew V. [read post]
