Search for: "Superior Lighting Group, Inc."
Results 141 - 160
of 299
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2012, 7:32 pm
Rogers Communications Inc. began. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:23 am
(f/k/a Insurance Corporation of Hannover) and Clarendon Insurance Group Inc., and their reinsurer, American Constantine Insurance Co., the U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
Forest City Enterprises, Inc., 426 U.S. 668 (1976) (due process limitations)--K.K. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
Cox sought medical care on an outpatient basis at the facilities of Pioneer Medical Group, Inc. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 11:00 am
F&G International Group Holdings, LLC, No. 20-cv-73 (S.D. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:36 am
In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 9:11 am
Defeating a motion to remand might be small consolation in light of the resources needed to expend on class-wide discovery. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:46 pm
Superior Forwarding, Inc., 762 F.2d 695, 697 (8th Cir. 1985)). [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
Superior Court, 13 Cal.4th 1104, 56 Cal. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Rogers Group, Inc. , 548 So. 2d 740, 741 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) (finding construction laborer’s injuries arising from personal lunch debt was compensable as employment placed construction workers in close proximity, combatants’ relationship originated at work, and wood used in altercation was implement of employment); Sentry Ins. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 5:40 am
Finally, the court found that the requirements of Rule 23(b)(3) – which requires predominance and superiority – were satisfied, easily concluding that “[t]he questions of law and fact that are common to the redefined class predominate over any individualized concerns” and that the class action mechanism was “superior” in light of the large number of claimants and the small amount involved for each individual. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 3:21 pm
Superior Court In April 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a landmark decision entitled Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 6:40 am
PNR, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Nor does it require a showing (necessary under Rule 23(b)(3)) that common issues “predominate” over individual issues, or that a class action is “superior” to other approaches. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 8:04 am
Rather, the image was syndicated through a plugin operated by Zemanta Inc., a software company that provides third-party content. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:32 pm
In re SoClean, Inc., Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liab. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 4:27 pm
Given this, parties to existing POD arrangements—PODs themselves, device manufacturers, as well as hospitals and ASCs with POD purchasing arrangements—should work with their health care regulatory counsel to assess or reassess risk under the anti-kickback statute in light of the OIG’s detailed commentary. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:52 am
Cleburne Living Center, Inc. (1985). [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
Delaware Tetra Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
Delaware Tetra Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
