Search for: "Supreme People's Court Observer"
Results 141 - 160
of 3,071
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
Brady's first exposure to Supreme Court cases was reading ones with a direct impact on his life—especially United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
But, as the United States Supreme Court has observed in a different but related context, the "inappropriate or controversial character of a statement is irrelevant to the question whether it deals with a matter of public concern. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 5:54 am
Said Rushil Umaretiya, who grew up in an Indian immigrant family and will be a freshman at the University of North Carolina.Quoted in "After the Affirmative Action Ruling, Asian Americans Ask What Happens Next/No matter their views of race-conscious admissions, students were wary of the college application process — and some thought little would change" (NYT).Umaretiya's observation is based on what he saw colleges and applicants doing before… [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
[The Supreme Court's misguided decision to grant Lorie Smith standing to pursue her entirely hypothetical claim against the State of Colorado in the web designer case.] [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 5:47 am
After determining that the law likely violated the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses, the district court facially enjoined the law's enforcement as to hormones and puberty blockers and applied the injunction to all people in the State. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 1:38 pm
Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens's Six Amendments: How and Why We Should Change the Constitution. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
After we decided Wasden, the Supreme Court [in City of Austin v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:42 am
Image credit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_law#/media/File:Extract_from_Burchard_of_Worms';_Decretum.jpgLet's turn to canon law. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
There is much to say and criticize about the Supreme Court's 2022-23 term. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 1:13 pm
Its roots are in the Supreme Court's 1943 decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 1:30 pm
But it's worth giving at least a little consideration to the other loan forgiveness case the Supreme Court decided yesterday: Department of Education v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 12:39 pm
" The Washington Supreme Court's decision raises serious and troubling issues of due process and equal protection. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 12:37 pm
Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:06 am
But somebody’s using false information in a Supreme Court filing document. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
FAIR In Rumsfeld, the Supreme Court rejected the argument that a law school had a First Amendment right to refuse to allow military recruiters on its property—which is to say, the Court rejected the argument that law schools could engage in a limited boycott of such recruiters. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:57 am
Fortunately for the Supreme Court, he did so. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:01 am
Consider, for instance, a professor discussing the arguments in the Supreme Court's affirmative action cases. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:39 am
On the Supreme Court, the two most committed originalists are Justices Thomas and Gorsuch. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:47 am
The exact request was "[t]wo cents worth for each [decedent]; six cents a mile for the six hundred and fifty [million] miles … they traveled in the year that they took these people's lives. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:57 am
Editor's Note: The following was originally published on Matt Tait's Substack, PwnAllTheThings. [read post]
