Search for: "T M v. K S" Results 141 - 160 of 1,836
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2023, 3:30 am by Kevin Kaufman
Top marginal rates range from Arizona’s 2.5 percent to California’s 13.3 percent. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 4:46 am by Peter Mahler
Not according to the Appellate Division, First Department’s decision last week in Srivatsa v Rosetta Holdings LLC. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 9:16 am by Daniel Gilman
Given the Supreme Court’s recent articulation of the major questions doctrine in West Virginia v. [read post]
11 Feb 2023, 8:13 pm by Bill Marler
 [3] Nature has created an ingenious bug in norovirus. [21] The round blue ball structure of norovirus is actually a protein surrounding the virus’s genetic material. [16, 33]  The virus attaches to the outside of cells lining the intestine, and then transfers its genetic material into those cells. [33] Once the genetic material has been transferred, norovirus reproduces, finally killing the human cells and releasing new copies of itself that attach to more cells of… [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:01 am by Karen Greenberg
Saifullah owned several businesses, buying one—a travel agency—as early as 1974 during his time as a student—and eventually owning others, including a media company, an import-export business for garments and other merchandise that catered to giant retail companies such as Walmart and K-Mart, and a real estate business. [read post]
Jae Um We can’t recommend enough Bill’s recent series, and the included commentary by our beloved advisor Jae Um, on law-firm dynamics, see Posts 330, 331, & 335). [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 10:10 am by Kim Krawiec
PubMed PMID: 33541252.Shah SK, Miller FG, Darton TC, Duenas D, Emerson C, Lynch HF, Jamrozik E, Jecker NS, Kamuya D, Kapulu M, Kimmelman J, MacKay D, Memoli MJ, Murphy SC, Palacios R, Richie TL, Roestenberg M, Saxena A, Saylor K, Selgelid MJ, Vaswani V, Rid A. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 3:08 pm by Eugene Volokh
Chen and Epple were expelled, and the Ninth Circuit held the expulsions didn't violate the First Amendment under Tinker v. [read post]