Search for: "TAYLOR v. STATE" Results 141 - 160 of 3,086
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2011, 4:45 am
Limitations on collective bargaining under the Taylor LawCity of New York v Uniformed Fire Officers Asso. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Confidential investigators employed by the New York State Department of Law are "confidential" employees within the meaning of the Taylor Law pursuant to §201.7(b).The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_02812.htm [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Confidential investigators employed by the New York State Department of Law are "confidential" employees within the meaning of the Taylor Law pursuant to §201.7(b).The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_02812.htm [read post]
20 May 2015, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The State Constitution’s prohibition of gifts of public funds is not necessarily applicable in situations involving labor-management relations between public employees and public employers under the Taylor Law2015 NY Slip Op 03837, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentIntroducing its decision in this appeal with the statement "Judicial review of an arbitrator's award is extremely limited," the Appellate Division explained that "A party seeking to overturn… [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 7:09 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 11:16 am by Eric C. Chaffee
The following law review articles relating to securities regulation are now available in paper format: Taylor Essner, Note, Insider Trading in Flux: Explaining the Second Circuit's Error in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 3:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In giving the lead judgment, Lord Sumption stated that s 12A of the Theft Act imposes strict liability only to the extent that anyone who was party to the taking of the vehicle (and in the immediate vicinity at the time of the injury) commits the offence, whether or not he was driving at the time. [read post]