Search for: "TURK v TURK"
Results 141 - 160
of 182
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:24 pm
Martone v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:41 am
Speaking of dead and communication.In a decision that basically all but over-ruled their decision in Crawford v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
(Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:00 am
" Pucci v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 7:19 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 6:23 pm
Ginsberg v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:39 pm
In the case of United Asset Management v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 10:00 pm
" (For Hi-Res Click On The Map) In USA v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 2:01 am
Regina (Kibris Turk Hava Yollari and another) v Secretary of State for Transport [2010] EWCA Civ 1093; [2010] WLR (D) 247 “The Secretary of State for Transport was entitled to refuse to grant operating permits to a Turkish airline and travel agent to allow them to operate scheduled and chartered flights between the United Kingdom and northern Cyprus. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 12:21 am
In the new case, United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:03 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Here’s a passage from Holder v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:45 pm
", explained that the plaintiffs in James Morrow et. al. v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 6:47 am
In Turk v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:24 am
As a common law principle, the banking sector has long functioned under the value of confidentiality, largely embodied in the famous 1924 United Kingdom decision, Tournier v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:29 am
I've gotten some ribbing from lawyers because of my representation of the defendant in Stern v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:21 am
The lawsuit, Kennedy et al. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 3:09 am
The 2d Circuit has affirmed the district court decision in Alexander v. [read post]
