Search for: "TYLER v. ROBERTS" Results 141 - 160 of 219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2016, 9:44 am by John Elwood
Ohio, 16-5580 (over the dissenting votes of Breyer and Justice Elena Kagan), and two-time relist Tyler v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 1:00 am by Clara Altman
 In The New Republic: The Book Peter Green reviews Jennifer Roberts’s Herodotus: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press). [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:37 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
Buzuvis, The feminist case for the NCAA’s recognition of competitive cheer as an emerging sport for women, 52 BOSTON COLLEGE LAW REVIEW 439 (2011) Matt Carter, Note, Punting on logic: the Roberts Court to sack small business once again in American Needle v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 1:17 pm by Lyle Denniston
Those cases were filed by the NRA, along with Chicagoans Kathryn Tyler, Van F. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The county’s lawyer, Robert Tyler, had serious difficulty persuading any of the three judges that his main client, the individual county official, a deputy clerk, has anything at stake legally in the fight. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 5:12 am by Steven Calabresi
The defendant must prove that "the *** prosecution policy 'had a discriminatory effect and that it was motivated by a discriminatory purpose.'" Tyler v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:14 am by admin
See Roberts v. the People of the United States National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 11:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Hughes: could compare cases where they narrow the claim of the TM registration v. narrow the claim of the patent—Maker’s Mark case where they have a registration for a wax seal but claim only red. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Dingemans J gave judgment in Lokhova v Tymula ([2016] EWHC 225 (QB))(heard 26 and 27 January 2016). [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Piritek (UK) v Robert Jackson [2018] EWHC 2030 (QB), Nicklin J imposed a 20 weeks’ sentence suspended for the period of two years against a defendant who, in continually breaching an injunction restraining him from publishing defamatory remarks about the Claimant, was found in contempt of court. [read post]