Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Weinstein" Results 141 - 160 of 208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2023, 3:48 am by SHG
This was applied by Justice Mark Dwyer in People v. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The Traditional Civil Damages Model For decades, protecting people's reputation from defamatory falsehood had been left to libel damages liability. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:45 am by Schachtman
No less than Judge Jack Weinstein, certainly a friend to the notion that “all evidence is probabilistic,” showed in his informal survey of federal judges of the Eastern District of New York, that judges have no idea of what probability corresponds to the criminal burden of proof: U.S. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:18 am by Beck, et al.
The qui tam act doesn’t want tag alongs; it denies any share of the swag to people who only tell the government old news. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 5:24 am by Chris Seaton
JULY saw a huge Twitter hack of many prominent people. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 1:26 am by John Hochfelder
Dept. 2003) - $2,500,000 for past pain and suffering (7 years) upheld for a 43 year old woman in a pedestrian knockdown car accident who sustained several skull fractures and significant and progressive brain damage that left her permanently demented Weinstein v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
It is apparent from epidemiological data that some people can engage in chain smoking for many decades without developing lung cancer. [read post]