Search for: "U. S. v. Rounds" Results 141 - 160 of 395
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm by Bernard Bell
This post explores the Third Circuit’s decision, Sanofi Adventis v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm by INFORRM
The Defendants in Craig McLachlan’s defamation case have alleged that the actor touched a colleague’s breast during a rehearsal for Neighbours in the 1980s during a preliminary hearing. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has an interesting post on “medical privacy” dealing with the case of ABC v St George’s Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (2017) EWCA Civ 336 which concludes that clinicians treating a patient with Huntingdon’s disease have an arguable duty to disclose the diagnosis to the patient’s daughters. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:45 pm by Lyle Denniston
  (The New England case is Pedersen v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:12 am by Lyle Denniston
The government’s Newman petition relied heavily on a 1983 Supreme Court decision in Dirks v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 2:44 pm by Lyle Denniston
Cacheris for leaving out of earlier briefing what its new brief called “the salient and binding precedent” — the Supreme Court’s 2003 decision in Federal Election Commission v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
 Media law in other jurisdictions Australia On 5 April 2023, Hill J ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s costs on an indemnity basis in the case of Rayney v Reynolds [No 4] [2022] WASC 360. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia The judgment of McCallum J staying Craig McLachlan’s defamation case until the final determination of the criminal proceedings commenced in the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria is available at McLachlan v Browne (No 9) [2019] NSWSC 10. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Stone v Moore [2016] SASCFC 50 allowed the defendant’s appeal against a judgment dismissing an action for libel and awarded damages of Aus$2,000. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 2:00 pm
Stone discusses Chief Justice Roberts's view that Supreme Court cases should be decided on narrow grounds (Professor Stone also posted a very similar piece on the U. of Chicago Faculty Law Blog here which does not require registration). [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Collective bargaining under the Taylor Law: submitting demands characterized as new or regressive after post-impasse fact-findingBuffalo Teachers Federation v Buffalo City School District, PERB U-34445Buffalo City School District v Buffalo Teachers Federation, PERB U-34462 On July 21, 2015, The Buffalo Teachers Federation [BTF] filed an improper practice charge with the New York Public Employment Relations Board [PERB]. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:30 am by David Kopel
s handgun ban would fail ‘[u]nder any of the standards of scrutiny.'” So the 2nd Circuit proceeded to Step 2 of Marzzarella: apply some form of heightened scrutiny. [read post]