Search for: "U. S. v. Sellers"
Results 141 - 160
of 229
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2020, 6:05 am
Halperin v Van Dam 2020 NY Slip Op 31301(U) April 28, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 652124/2019 Judge: Andrea Masley explains why the attorneys remain in the case. [read post]
28 May 2009, 4:14 am
In this case , Romano v Ficchi , 2009 NY Slip Op 51011(U) , Decided on May 22, 2009 , Supreme Court, Kings County , Rivera, J. plaintiff sought to buy a condo with a view. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 8:58 am
FCC, 518 U. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:28 am
S. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:20 am
Hoffman v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 5:43 am
"[4] The Sixth Circuit's decision in Online Merchants Guild v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 9:30 am
Moore v. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
Thus, to the extent the blanket license is a different product, ASCAP is not really a joint sales agency offering the individual goods of many sellers, but is a separate seller offering its blanket license, of which the individual compositions are raw material ASCAP, in short, made a market in which individual composers are inherently unable to compete fully effectively. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”“[P]rivate health insurers are well equipped to conduct sophisticated arm's-length price negotiations,” therefore “looking to the negotiated prices providers accept from insurers makes at least as much sense, and arguably more, than relying on chargemaster prices that are not the result of direct negotiation between buyer and seller. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:41 am
One, 18 U. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:27 pm
Unlike Lucy v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am
The program for this week's American Political History Conference includes many items of note for readers of this blog. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:00 am
The unreported decision is Cole v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:00 am
Lieblich v Pruzan 2012 NY Slip Op 31140(U) April 28, 2012 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: 104523/11 Judge: Paul G. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:18 am
Rivera v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLC (2nd Cir. 2011); Ileto v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:34 am
Relators alleged that the state could impose its taxing jurisdiction on remote sellers based on the attributional nexus theory. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 11:44 am
In Patterson v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 11:44 am
In Patterson v. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 10:02 am
U is for Union des Consommateurs, the Quebec consumer group that lost a Supreme Court of Canada battle with Dell Computer over the enforceability of Dell's online contract. [read post]
