Search for: "U.S. v. Bernstein" Results 141 - 160 of 338
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2015, 4:23 am by Kevin LaCroix
  By way of background, Mark is a partner at the Bernstein, Litowitz, Berger & Grossmann law firm. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
In yet another U.S. securities class action lawsuit involving a non-U.S. company and a corruption investigation in the company’s home country, on March 19, 2015 a shareholder of Chemical & Mining Company of Chile, Inc. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 7:17 am by Rachel, Law Clerk and Office Manager
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter:Hill media fight over harassment policy, some say it could destroy Parliamentary Press GalleryNon-Competition Provision Results In Increased Notice Period By BC CourtConrad Black permanently banned as director or officer of any Ontario public company 100 academics urge major changes to ‘dangerous’ anti-terrorism billUS Navy judge lifts order banning female guards from touching Guantanamo interneesCanada’s Davis LLP… [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
We focus first on the landmark 1813 case Queen v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:31 am by Rebecca Jeschke
" Cohn has been involved with EFF for over 20 years, first working on Bernstein v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:16 pm by Amul Kalia
Related Issues: PrivacyCALEAEncrypting the WebLaw Enforcement AccessSecurityRelated Cases: Bernstein v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 12:33 pm by Cindy Cohn
" H/T Chris Soghoian: http://paranoia.dubfire.net/2010/09/calea-and-encryption.html Related Issues: PrivacyCALEAEncrypting the WebLaw Enforcement AccessNational Security LettersSecurityRelated Cases: Bernstein v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 2:40 pm by Cindy Cohn
So unless the goverment wants to mandate that you are forbidden to run anything that is not U.S. government approved on your devices,  they won't stop bad guys from getting  access to strong encryption. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 12:00 am by Cindy Cohn
So unless the goverment wants to mandate that you are forbidden to run anything that is not U.S. government approved on your devices,  they won't stop bad guys from getting  access to strong encryption. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
  With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
This will permit the district court to accept the Release in evidence and conduct the trial of this case without regard to the restraint we previously placed upon it.C.A.2 1954.Bernstein v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 4:44 am
I’ve been thinking about the 1968 Supreme Court case of Hunter v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 3:39 pm
These laws were invalidated by a unanimous decision of the “conservative” Supreme Court in Buchanan v. [read post]