Search for: "UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Does 1-30"
Results 141 - 160
of 291
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
(b) Approved forms.(1) Contested actions. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 2:04 pm
Does 1-59, for example, hackers unlawfully accessed copyrighted materials on a company’s protected website.[5] The company brought suit against the unknown culprits — named “John Does” in the complaint — for violating the CFAA, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act and the Copyright Act.[6] It then provided the court with the internet protocol addresses of each defendant.[7] The court granted the company’s motion… [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 6:40 am
In a notification of loss of rights under Rule 112(1) EPC of 30 June 2015 the Receiving Section informed the applicant that the filing date did not lie within the twelve-month priority period and that the application did therefore not enjoy a right of priority with respect to the oldest priority claimed in the application. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:23 pm
” The Act does not take effect until January 1, 2020, so there is still an opportunity for it to be further refined by the California Legislature or preempted by federal comprehensive privacy legislation. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
This CBR is focused on orthotic suppliers that have billed the Medicare Part B program for both off-the-shelf and custom-fitted prefabricated spinal orthoses (commonly referred to as “braces”[1]) in claims with dates of service from October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2017.[2] CBR201803 focuses on the following Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes: Prefabricated Custom-Fitted Spinal Orthoses.[3] L0627: Lumbar orthosis, sagittal… [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 3:49 pm
Thus, such entities are exempted from any duty to test or inspect sealed containers which would not normally be opened until they reach the ultimate consumer.[3] However, to the extent that any party in the supply chain adds to or modifies a product, including packaging and labelling, that party will also owe some common law duty to the purchaser and user in respect of those changes.[4] ACL Statutory Warranties and Guarantees: Strict Liability Actions Australia codified strict… [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 1:15 pm
Does anyone even want me back at work, and does anyone even care that I got injured? [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:41 am
I have observed calls come in where the caller id. says “unknown caller. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:50 am
Does our organization have personnel with tra [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 9:22 pm
How the parasites spread in 2017 remains unknown. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
§ 1292(a)(1). [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:33 pm
If plea negotiations are ongoing, the parties may review the status of the plea offer. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:27 am
For instance the signature of a witness does not indicate assent or an intention to be bound, but instead is intended to verify the signature of the party to the document.)7. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:27 am
For instance the signature of a witness does not indicate assent or an intention to be bound, but instead is intended to verify the signature of the party to the document.)7. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am
HHS has been seeking to find such a sponsor to take custody of Doe since her arrival in September—alas, to no avail.[1] The principal dispute in the suit was whether HHS had the legal authority to continue to prevent Doe from being able to travel to the clinic for her medical procedure for an unknown further period of time—on top of the six or seven weeks that had already passed since Doe chose to have an… [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
Moreover, the terms stated on Page 1 were not agreed to by both parties because the lender had not yet approved the loan.So, Page 1, without more, does not constitute an executed loan contract, or an integrated one. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:35 am
The Enlarged Board sees no reason to assume, in the absence of an express provision, that Article 106(2) EPC, which stipulates that a decision which does not terminate proceedings as regards one of the parties can only be appealed together with the final decision, unless the decision allows a separate appeal, is also to be applied to the petition for review procedure. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 12:27 am
On January 1, 2019, the equivalent of three days per week for ten weeks, or a maximum of 30 days in any 52 consecutive week period. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 12:27 am
On January 1, 2019, the equivalent of three days per week for ten weeks, or a maximum of 30 days in any 52 consecutive week period. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 7:15 am
It identifies the patentee and the opponents and, in this context, also mentions third party observations. [read post]
