Search for: "US v. Coats" Results 141 - 160 of 1,073
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2010, 7:13 am by Matt Osenga
  The court decided, in a 2-1 decision, that the preamble of the claim in Marrin v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:44 am by Abbie Peterson
The joists are composed of wood particles and treated with Flak Jacket coating, a proprietary coating designed by Weyerhaeuser. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 3:34 pm by David A. Beatty
On April 30, 2013, the Court of Appeals granted leave in Hoover v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:35 pm by Matthew Guariglia
Take Action Tell Congress to End the CDR Program Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 6:16 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: EVERYTHING SOCIAL SECURITY: Be prepared when disaster strikes, December 4, 2015, Wicked Local Duxbury, by Kirsten Alberino More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:43 pm
The concept was characterised by the fact that a third party attempts to use signs corresponding to trade marks with a reputation, to ride on its coat-tails in order to benefit from its power of attraction, its reputation and its prestige, and to exploit, without paying any financial compensation and without being required to make efforts of its own in that regard, the marketing effort expended by the proprietor of that mark in order to create and maintain the image of that mark. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 10:47 am
The '210 patent describes a method of coating substrates such as those used in catalytic converters. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:04 am by Patricia Salkin
Beck v Town of Groton, 2015 WL 1499506 (NDNY 4/1/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.newyorklawjournal.com/id=1202723034693/John-A-Beck-Plaintiff-v-Town-of-Groton-Defendant-511CV420 See also, http://www.newyorklawjournal.com/id=1202723075219/Upstate-Town-Faulted-for-Violating-Mans-Free-Speech-RightsFiled under: Current Caselaw - New York, Signs [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:09 am
The case is Case C-97/12 P Louis Vuitton Malletier v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Friis Group International ApS intervening, a ruling of the Eighth Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of 15 May. [read post]