Search for: "US v. Flowers" Results 141 - 160 of 767
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2024, 3:50 am by Jocelyn Bosse
The recent decision of the Munich Local Division in SES v Hanshow seemed to go in an odd direction by using the application as filed and prosecution history in the claim interpretation.Rose Hughes also speculated on the potential referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal to consider how much the description should be taken into account for claim interpretation, given the confusing and contradictory case law on this important question. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 1:00 am by CAFE
On this episode of Stay Tuned, "Crime & Politics," host Preet Bharara answers your questions about: -- Prosecutors’ personalities -- The Supreme Court’s decision in Flowers v. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 6:56 am by Richard Hunt
If nobody can use it excluding the disabled is not discrimination. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 7:47 am by Michelle O'Neil
” These V-Day gone south scenarios are enough to make even the most secure of us jump off the deep end. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:45 pm
Clearly a supermarket, department store or major industrial conglomeration could well have reason to apply in respect of a vast range of goods/services but that's unlikely for a flower shop or taxi business. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:52 am by John L. Welch
Chesapeake Marine Tours, Inc. dba Watermark Cruises, Cancellation No. 92050879 [Petition for cancellation of a registration for ANNAPOLIS TOURS for "conducting guided tours of historic districts and other areas of cities" on the grounds of fraud, genericness, and lack of acquired distinctiveness].June 13, 2012 - 2 PM: Atlas Flowers, Inc. d/b/a Golden Flowers v. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 10:07 pm by Mark Summerfield
  Australian PBR’s perform a similar function in Australia to Plant Patents in the US. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:22 am
 And then there is the case of State v. [read post]