Search for: "US v. Hopkins"
Results 141 - 160
of 707
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2018, 4:04 pm
Monroe v Hopkins[2017] EWHC 433 (QB) (England) Defamation claims arising from social media platforms featured in 2017, the most prominent perhaps being that of food writer Jack Monroe against journalist Katie Hopkins. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:45 am
Locke v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
Magistrate James Hopkins to set the size of the bond. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 6:03 am
Even registering a trademarked term as a domain name, and using it to put up a site criticizing the mark owner, has been held to be protected First Amendment activity in a number of cases (see, e.g., Lucas Nursery & Landscaping, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm
It is a useful demonstration of the Lachaux inferential approach to the s.1(1) Defamation Act 2013 serious harm test, and starkly illustrates that success or failure in meeting the serious harm threshold depends on the facts of each case. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
On 3 April 2019 the Supreme Court gave its judgment in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:25 am
Hively v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 4:38 am
EOG Resources v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:47 am
In 2008, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled, in Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 5:02 am
Case Law: OPO v MLA, Shock and disbelief at the Court of Appeal – Dan Tench Case Law: ETK v News Group Newspapers “Privacy Injunctions and Children” – Edward Craven Case Preview: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Twitter libel trial about meaning and serious harm Case Law: “Spiller v Joseph – the New Defence of Honest Comment” – Catherine Rhind Case Law: Iqbal v Dean Manson, harassment by letter –… [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:10 am
For instance, in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In this case, Young v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:11 am
Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989). [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:11 am
Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989). [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 3:43 am
Hopkins’ appellate counsel deemed this sufficient and filed the Anders brief, but the appellate court notes that the trial judge had no jurisdiction to resentence Hopkins because of the pending appeal; it appoints new counsel for the appeal… The 8th District concludes in State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
Also see prior posts on the CFPB v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 6:23 am
Pinkney v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 8:51 pm
Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989), and Oncale v. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Hopkins v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 2:55 pm
In Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
