Search for: "US v. Mark Stephens" Results 141 - 160 of 1,161
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2022, 8:57 pm by Bill Marler
In contrast, human infection with E. coli O157:H7 usually produces symptomatic illness often marked by severe, often bloody, diarrhea; severe adverse health outcomes or even death can result. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:14 pm by Katherine Pompilio
The vote on the case was 6 to 3, with Justices Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor in dissent. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:26 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
In our recent paper, we critique Abbott’s proposal whilst contemplating AI’s status as property or person.It is perhaps most interesting to compare the contrasting fortunes of the Project’s filings in Australia (Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879) and England and Wales (Thaler v The Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs And Trade Marks [2020] EWHC 2412 (Pat)/Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents Trade Marks And Designs… [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm by INFORRM
Stephen Kinsella (Clean Up The Internet) and Harry Dyer considered whether the banning of anonymous online accounts would reduce abuse for Inforrm this week, both concluding banning anonymity is not the answer. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 6:14 am by James Romoser
To suggest a piece for us to consider, email us at roundup@scotusblog.com. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 11:35 am by Jonathan Shaub
Stephen Bannon has defied the Jan. 6 Committee’s subpoena for documents and testimony. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
In the first article in this series I looked at the US approach to the role of the inventor in patent law and practice, and at the recent decision of Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) upholding the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that the ‘AI’ machine DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler… [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
  On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
In the first article in this series I looked at the US approach to the role of the inventor in patent law and practice, and at the recent decision of Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) upholding the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that the ‘AI’ machine DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler… [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
  On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 8:08 pm by Francis Pileggi
Stephen Bainbridge on this case from his eponymous blog:   Major Delaware Corporate Law Development: Delaware Supreme Court “Revises” Aronson Standard for Demand Futility United Food and Commercial Workers Union v. [read post]