Search for: "US v. Slater"
Results 141 - 160
of 199
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
The Slater v Condappa case - see above. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 12:13 am
In Michigan One Funding, LLC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:15 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 11:03 am
” Zeis v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:28 pm
In today’s case (Herman v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 5:58 am
Slater assumed that, should Wimmer wish to make use of it, he would get in contact and make a monetary payment. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:12 pm
V. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 5:34 pm
In Kloian v Domino's Pizza, LLC, 273 Mich App 449, 454; 733 NW 2d 766 (2006), the court enforced a settlement agreement reached through email communications. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:40 am
Blog As always, if you know of any Canadian law blogs we’re missing, please let us know. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
Hughes v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:56 pm
Case Name: Honolulutraffic.com et al. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:36 pm
(Innovationpartners) Featured resources: Japanese literature databases JP-NETe and J-STAGE (Patent Quality Matters) Global – Copyright Copyright and creatives: Leigh Harrison’s open letter (1709 Blog) Is copyright law making a monkey out of David Slater? [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 12:04 pm
NATIVIDAD SANTIAGO; BETSY SANTIAGO; and MAZIE, SLATER, KATZ and FREEMAN, LLC, App. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:30 pm
Title: Messerschmidt v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm
Slater, 2011 WL 1087240, at *3 (citing Cottam v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 12:26 pm
See also Slater v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 2:22 pm
Binary Law gives up on trying to use words to tell us he’s got the social meeja blues, and resorts to diagrams instead. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 5:34 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So holds Slater v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:36 pm
In the case of Police v Slater (14 September 2010) the District Court in Auckland found that Whale Oil had been in breach of name suppression orders made by the Court. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:11 am
The winner: Cat(therine) Slater (Serjeants) suggests that “the successful IP lawyer will be wearing a new perfume/aftershave soon to launch with a marketing campaign devised by Lord Justice Jacob: “L’Oréal … beyond the wildest dreams of the poor” [If this allusion needs explanation, see Jacob LJ's comments in L’Oréal v Bellure, noted here by the IPKat]”. [read post]
