Search for: "USA v. Cross" Results 141 - 160 of 742
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2020, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
” Yesterday the Supreme Court ruled in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed StarkIs a company’s post-breach forensic report subject to discovery in subsequent breach related litigation? [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm by Schachtman
”[1] Did Judge Milazzo engage in judicial dodging with rejecting the relevancy argument and emphasizing the truism that Sanofi could highlight the discrepancy on cross-examination? [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 7:59 am by Ronald Mann
GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v Outokumpu Stainless USA is a bit different from the typical Supreme Court arbitration case. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 3:42 am
Moke USA, LLC, Opposition No. 91233014 (April 21, 2020) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Nasrallah v. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
The EU will commence negotiations with the USA for an EU-wide agreement. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm by David Kris
With a few more days to read the inspector general’s Crossfire Hurricane report and watch the C-SPAN video of his congressional testimony (and listen to the no-bull version on Lawfare), I have five additional observations beyond those set out in a series of tweets on the day the report was released, discussions on the Lawfare podcast the following day, and conversations with NPR, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 2:15 pm by Cyberleagle
The YouTube and Uploaded cases (C-682/18 Petersongs v YouTube and C-683/18 Elsevier v Cyando) pending from the German Federal Supreme Court include questions around the communication to the public right, as do C-392/19 VG Bild-Kunst v Preussischer Kulturbesitz(Germany, BGH), C-442/19 Brein v News Service Europe (Netherlands, Supreme Court) and C-597/19 Mircom v Telenet (Belgium).Questions about injunctions against intermediaries are also raised in… [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:49 am by Marty Lederman
[Cross-posted at Just Security]Two cases currently before the Supreme Court involve whether the Constitution prohibits subpoenas issued to Donald Trump’s accounting firm, Mazars USA, LLP, requiring Mazars to provide non-privileged financial records relating to Trump and certain of his business entities. [read post]