Search for: "USA v. Locke"
Results 141 - 160
of 216
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Or on life support, at least - MEI v JCM American Corp stayed pending outcome of Mars v Coin Acceptors (Property, intangible) O2 Micro - ITC judge grants in part O2's motion for summary determination of importa [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:24 pm
Likewise, a fraudulent joinder standard should not lock the doors of removal to a defendant facing “nothing more than conclusions. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
See e.g., Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
FEC v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(Afro-IP) New Zealand Haka war dance now covered by intellectual property (Techdirt) Nigeria Nigerian musicians want payment for music played on airplanes (Afro-IP) Poland PARIS-DAKAR seeks to invalidate world trade mark registration for DAKAR by Polish company by the same name (Class 46) South Africa Delays at the SA registry favour trade mark proprietor: Golden Fried Chicken (Pty) Ltd v Soulsa CC (Afro-IP) Spain Exhaustion of trade… [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
AND ALERT LOCK AND KEY v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 8:33 am
” Isolation and Depression During COVID-19 Lock Down? [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:21 am
Paul posted about how the Supreme Court’s recent decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 8:35 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
MiTek USA, Inc., C16-1150 RSM, 2016 WL 4418013, at 11 (W.D. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
Madden v Midland Funding, LLC, 786 F.3d 246 (2d Cir. 2015), cert. denied, 136, S. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 7:33 am
The companies argued that the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 12:02 pm
Locke, 363 S.W.2d 247, 253 (Tex. 1962). 2. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:06 am
See United States v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 10:35 am
Laeser,Contrary to your assertion, the State of Florida v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 10:51 am
(June 14, 1991) (presented by plaintiffs’ counsel Jim Pettit, of Greitzer & Locks), in Radcliff v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 9:47 am
The Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in Berger v. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 5:35 pm
As the United States Supreme Court explained long ago in Hudson v. [read post]
