Search for: "United Mortgage Corp." Results 141 - 160 of 593
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2015, 3:58 am by Marx Sterbcow
., against PHH Corporation, REALOGY Holdings Corp., PHH Mortgage Corporation, PHH Home Loans LLC, RMR Financial LLC, NE Moves Mortgage LLC, PHH Broker Partner Corporation, REALOGY GROUP LLC, REALOGY Intermediate Holdings, Title Resources Group LLC, West Coast Escrow Company, TRG Services Escrow Inc., NRT LLC, REALOGY Services Group LLC, and REALOGY Services Venture Partner LLC in United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 8:01 am by Steven Cohen
Stetson Petroleum Corp. et al v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Indeed, in 2014, there were two sets of lawsuits filed against the boards of companies that had experienced high-profile data breaches, Target Corp. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 11:25 pm by The Clinton Law Firm
Bank of Boston Corp., 100 F.3d 1348, 1351 (7th Cir. 1996) (Easterbrook, J., dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc) (“The Rooker-Feldman doctrine . . . does not apply to malpractice suits. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Goldstein accused Pikus of mismanaging vacancies and attempting to artificially inflate the company’s rent roll and stockpile vacant units, in order to increase the value of Pikus’s membership interest by forcing a premature sale or refinancing of the property. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
The United States Department of Agriculture’s California Raisin Marketing Order for raisins requires raisin growers in certain years to give percentage of their crop to the government, free of charge. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
United States[13], the district court refused to enforce plaintiff’s Rule 45 subpoena that sought documents from defendant’s expert witness. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
(Mycogen Corp. v Monsanto Co. (2002) 28 Cal.4th 888, 896-897, fn. 7.) [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 10:42 am by John Stigi
  The Second Circuit recognized that its holding regarding Item 303 of Regulation S-K was directly “at odds” with the 2014 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in In re NVIDIA Corp. [read post]