Search for: "United States v. Alexander Grant"
Results 141 - 160
of 412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
“Curry favour with Donald Trump'” by granting trade mark rights… seriously? [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
See Alexander Holmes, Appellant-Defendant, v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
The FDCA, in turn, defines “drug” as:(A) articles recognized in the official United States Pharmacopœia, official Homœopathic Pharmacopœia of the United States, or official National Formulary, or any supplement to any of them; and (B) articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals; and (C) articles (other than food) intended to affect the structure or… [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 10:06 am
–stage amicus brief on behalf of a bipartisan group of former members of Congress in support of the Obama administration in United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 10:08 am
Alexander, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Fla. 2007); Alexander v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
United States, the Court held that the commerce clause power was plenary and not subject to non-textual limitations of state sovereignty. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
United States, 11-6602; Cox v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
United States, 48 F. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:45 pm
As the Founding-era Supreme Court held in McCulloch v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 6:57 am
The editorial board of The New York Times urges the Court to grant review in Shaygan v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
Most recently, in McDonald v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 9:25 am
In the United States, the doctrine was enshrined in the famous property rights case of Johnson v. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 6:43 am
United States or permitted by its ruling in Munaf v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:32 am
Justin Riemer is Chief Counsel of the Republican National Committee, which filed an amicus brief in support of the state in Rucho v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 1:16 pm
United States, Jackson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
United States, 15-8629, is a revival, having been to the Court once before. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
That would suggest, at least in comparison with non-MPP immigration judge hearings, that immigration judges in MPP were granting asylum claims at lower rates than usual, based on statistics about claims of applicants within the United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am
It is the only part of the Necessary and Proper Clause quoted by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 1:09 am
Click here to go to www.nylj.com
United States, respondent-appellant v. [read post]
