Search for: "United States v. Cardinal" Results 141 - 160 of 263
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2022, 4:46 pm
“The cardinal rule of contract interpretation is to determine what the intent of the parties was at the time they entered into the contract. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm by INFORRM
As Lord Browne-Wilkinson said in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Pierson [1998] AC 539: A power conferred by Parliament in general terms is not to be taken to authorise the doing of acts by the donee of the power which adversely affect the legal rights of the citizen or the basic principles on which the law of the United Kingdom is based unless the statute conferring the power makes it clear that such was the intention of Parliament. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:16 pm by Karwan Eskerie
Vejdeland and Others v Sweden (Application no. 1813/07) – Read judgment  “Will both teacher and pupils simply become the next victims of the tyranny of tolerance, heretics, whose dissent from state-imposed orthodoxy must be crushed at all costs? [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 10:08 am by Erin Miller
United States Docket: 09-392 Issues: (1) Whether Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(i)(1)(C)–permitting a defendant to comment on “matters relating to an appropriate sentence”–entitles a defendant to be notified prior to the pronouncement of sentence that sex offender special conditions of supervised release are contemplated; (2) whether 18 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am by John Elwood
United States, 18-7449 Issues: (1) Whether a district court has the authority to reconsider the merits of a 28 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 11:00 pm by GJEL Staff
Last updated: 10.24.16 People who follow the news in the United States are not strangers to disturbing legal stories that often dominate the headlines. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 5:56 am by charonqc
More recently he appeared in Bowman v United Kingdom [1998] 26 EHRR 1, in which the European Court of Human Rights declared an electoral law inhibiting campaigns by Catholic pressure groups to be incompatible with the article 10 right to freedom of expression. [read post]