Search for: "United States v. Gutierrez" Results 141 - 160 of 222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2011, 8:24 am by Kali Borkoski
"Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Cir.)Petition for certiorari United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 3:14 am by Florian Mueller
As I wrote in the context of yesterday's decision by a German appeals court to stay a Motorola v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 11:26 am
Yesterday CAAF docketed two certified issues in an Air Force case:WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS APPLIED THE CORRECT STANDARD OF REVIEW WHEN DETERMINING WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE DENIED THE DEFENSE MOTION FOR A SANITY BOARD.WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED BY FINDING THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE DENIED APPELLANT'S REQUEST FOR A SANITY BOARD FINDING HE HAD NOT MET HIS BURDEN OF FACTUAL PERSUASION TO JUSTIFY… [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:36 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Amgen then filed a petition to the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Amy Howe
  The first respondent, Carlos Gutierrez, came to the United States when he was five and became a lawful permanent resident (which, as the name suggests, allows him to stay in the United States as long as he doesn’t get into trouble with the law) when he was nineteen. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
Cl. 2, Amendments IX, X[1]·      German Basic Law, arts.20-25; 31[2]·      Constitution of South Africa, arts. 1, 2, 39, 146-150[3]·      Indiana Code 1-1-2-1[4]·      Hierarchy of Law in Georgia[5]__________Hierarchy of Law in the United StatesConstitution of the United StatesArticle, § 1All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a… [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:29 am by Joe Palazzolo
Tuesday, Jan. 17 • The Supreme Court will hear arguments in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:13 am by Christa Culver
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply United States Steel Corp. v. [read post]