Search for: "United States v. Hole" Results 141 - 160 of 810
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2007, 8:32 am
La.) asserting infringement of Hakim’s United States Patents No. 6,321,931 (the ‘931 patent) and No. 6,357,620 (the ‘620 patent) by Avent’s leak-resistant drinking cups. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 1:36 pm by Gene Quinn
CMW appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:29 am by Peter Margulies
” As Judge Gorsuch noted in dissenting from the denial of rehearing in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:08 pm by Pace Law School Library
Addressing the e-waste crisis: the need for comprehensive federal e-waste regulation within the United States. 14 Chapman L. [read post]
6 May 2016, 3:37 am by SHG
 It came after the United States Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:38 am by Brian A. Comer
On June 21, 2013, a jury returned a defense verdict in a rollover case tried in United States District Court, Aiken Division. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 4:04 am by SHG
United States was the case, the opportunity, for the Supreme Court of the United States to change this. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:54 am by Kevin LaCroix
NAB’s registration statement in the United States, for example, pertained to “ordinary shares” (At page 58 of the Supplemental Joint Appendix in Morrison v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 7:47 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Thus, as stated in the Original Decision: the limited evidence of record as to this issue, which is the ’491 patent itself, specifically teaches that wet-set tactile warning surface units having a flange with a hole therein are removable and replaceable, contrary to the assertion now made by the Patent Owner in this appeal [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:45 am by Nabiha Syed
The Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 4:19 am by SHG
The 10th Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]