Search for: "United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission" Results 141 - 160 of 318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm by John Elwood
Brown (1943); and (2) whether a binding agreement among multiple states, with both intra- and interstate effects, violates the Compact Clause, Article I, § 10, cl. 3 of the United States Constitution, in the absence of congressional approval. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 7:37 am by Dennis Crouch
  Importation counts as introduction into interstate commerce, so the approval requirement applies. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 8:07 am
CSX Transportation Issue: Whether, under the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act, a transloader that accepts delivery of freight is automatically liable for demurrage charges under a rail carrier’s tariff. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 8:31 am
Moreover, to the extent that the insurers provided coverage to policyholders in the continental United States, their activities affected interstate commerce. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
Verizon New York, Inc. 14-439Issue: (1) Whether the exhaustion requirements of Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:43 pm
It presents issues of interstate commerce - the Federal Communications Act of 1934, setting of rates by the Interstate Commerce Commission, contract law and diversity jurisdiction. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 522 F.3d 937, 940 (9th Cir. 2008); see United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 11:01 pm by Bona Law PC
And if you want a deep dive on the issue, you should read my friend Chris Sager’s outstanding book “United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:02 am
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Brief amicus curiae of United States Petition for certiorari (08-1547) Petitioner’s reply (08-1547) Brief amicus curiae of Commissioned Officers Association of the United States Public Health Service, Inc. (08-1547) Docket: 08-1555 Title: Samantar v. [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 4:02 pm
  Finally, the Court held that the shackling of Ayala during her non-jury sentencing was not an abuse of discretion.United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 7:18 am by Jennifer Davis
In 1964, she took up the second important case of her career, United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
. — F.Supp.2d —-, 2007 WL 43747 (S.D.Ohio) United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 12:20 pm
Hasting, 461 U.S. 499, 505-06, 103 S.Ct. 1974, 76 L.Ed.2d 96 (1983); United States. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 7:00 am by Adam White
The “quasi-judicial,” “quasi-legislative” distinction long predated Roosevelt and Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes; it dated back at least 40 years, to the Interstate Commerce Commission, which Congress created in the same year that it repealed the Tenure of Office Act for executive officers. [read post]