Search for: "United States v. Laura" Results 141 - 160 of 576
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2021, 2:55 am by Colby Pastre
GILTI is meant to ensure that, regardless of where a U.S. company does business in the world, its foreign subsidiaries pay at least a minimum rate of income tax, if not to other countries, then to the United States. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 11:09 am by Josh H. Escovedo
On September 9, 2015, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that Costco was willfully infringing Tiffany & Co. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 9:00 am
            Last February, the United States Supreme Court added another layer to its punitive damages jurisprudence in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court ruled 5-4 that stock options are not taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 7:29 am by Alex R. McQuade
Andrew Keane Woods commented on the United States’ tendency for creating, incubating, and training future enemies. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:00 pm by Laura Dooley and Rodger Citron
The Court denied Du Pont’s request to review the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit’s judgment affirming the jury’s $40 million award in favor of plaintiffs, a married couple, asserting negligence claims against Du Pont. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
” Counting to 5 (podcast) features a discussion of Epic Systems v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 7:19 am by Will Aitchison
More evidence that courts are tightening up on multi-state FLSA collective actions comes from Vasquez v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Hughes v. [read post]