Search for: "United States v. Min" Results 141 - 160 of 187
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2012, 7:34 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Kathy Hanley: Congress needs to keep more money in the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 7:22 am by Gilles Cuniberti
STEWART, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in the United States Symeon C. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 4:52 am by Marie Louise
(Spicy IP)   Russia Judge: Pirate Party name-ban decision stands (TorrentFreak)   United Kingdom EWCA (Civ): Clippings services users must have licence or infringe newspapers’ copyright: The Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd & Others v Meltwater Holding BV & Others (Out-Law.com) (1709 Blog) (IPKat) (IPKat) EWHC forces BT to block links to pirate site: Twentieth Century Fox & Ors v British Telecommunications (Out-Law) (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak)… [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
Paul, Min.: West, c2011 KF3783 .N65 2011 See Catalog Collective liability (International law) ACCOUNTABILITY FOR COLLECTIVE WRONG DOING / EDITED BYTRACY ISAACS, RICHARD VERNON Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011 KZ7075 .A923 2011 See Catalog Combatants and noncombatants (International law) THE IMAGE BEFORE THE WEAPON: A CRITICAL HISTORY OF THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN COMBATANT AND CIVILIAN / HELEN M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
Paul, Min.: West, c2011 KF3783 .N65 2011 See Catalog Collective liability (International law) ACCOUNTABILITY FOR COLLECTIVE WRONG DOING / EDITED BYTRACY ISAACS, RICHARD VERNON Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011 KZ7075 .A923 2011 See Catalog Combatants and noncombatants (International law) THE IMAGE BEFORE THE WEAPON: A CRITICAL HISTORY OF THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN COMBATANT AND CIVILIAN / HELEN M. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 9:30 pm by Adam Wagner
Prisoners’ rights Malcolm v Ministry of Justice [2010] EWHC 3389 (QB) (21 December 2010) A prisoner was not entitled to human rights damages despite being given only 30 mins fresh air per day. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:53 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The court concluded: The Minnesota Constitution provides broader protections to property owners than does the United States Constitution when property is taken, damaged, or destroyed for a public or governmental use. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 6:08 am by Eva Rosenberg
(Order on Motion to Stay in Perry et al. v. [read post]