Search for: "United States v. Singh"
Results 141 - 160
of 375
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2018, 7:18 am
Andrew Grotto outlined six tools the United States can use to combat the national security risks of Kaspersky Labs’ software. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm
This generalization is true not just for companies in the United States but for all companies around the world. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:31 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:05 pm
1 Dec 2017, 11:27 am
Works of the United States government, including works prepared by its officers and employees, do not qualify for copyright protection. 17 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
Barnes v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 5:51 am
State v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
-Dallas 2012, no pet.); Singh v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:49 pm
To give the casual ready a flavour of the kinds of mind-bending hoops a homelessness officer has to jump through I quote directly from Homelessness & Allocations on the subject of just one tiny aspect of family members of EEA nationals:- “In Singh and Others v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 4:53 pm
United States Eugene Volokh has a post on the recent decision of the US Court of Appeals of the 5th Circuit in the case of Block v Tanenhaus [pdf] which concerns libel by quotation out of context. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm
United States Actor James Woods has settled a defamation claim over a Tweet calling him a “cocaine addict”. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 4:14 am
Tej Pratap Singh and Ors. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:45 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Johnson, Timothy Russell, Oral Arguments and Decision Making on the United States Supreme Court (2004). [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:13 am
On February 22, 2017, the Supreme Court decided Life Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 8:38 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:45 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 5:18 am
The United States, at the time, characterized that seizure as “unlawful. [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
Looking beyond India, the majority opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood v Casey[9] had, while examining a plea for reconsideration of Roe v Wade[10], had presented before itself the following questions: a) whether the central rule had been found unworkable; b) whether the rule could be removed without serious inequity to those who had relied upon it; c) whether thecentral rule had become a doctrinal anachronism; and… [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
Looking beyond India, the majority opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood v Casey[9] had, while examining a plea for reconsideration of Roe v Wade[10], had presented before itself the following questions: a) whether the central rule had been found unworkable; b) whether the rule could be removed without serious inequity to those who had relied upon it; c) whether thecentral rule had become a doctrinal anachronism; and… [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 3:30 am
United States, which in 1923 held that Bhaghat Singh Thind, “a high caste Hindu, of full Indian blood, born [in] India” was not “a white person” under the naturalization laws. [read post]
