Search for: "W. D. Reed"
Results 141 - 160
of 271
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm
” The petition alleges that John’s previous SOCE counseling in another state “reduce[d] his anxiety, eliminate[d] his depression, and overc[a]me his daily thoughts of suicide,” but New Jersey’s ban prevents him from receiving beneficial “talk therapy” because of the state’s “hostility toward the content and viewpoint espoused in such counseling. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Shigemi and Reed W. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Because doing the job right would require research well beyond prescription medical products, we looked for research help, and enterprising (pun intended) Reed Smith associate Kevin Hara stepped up to handle the initial spadework. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
From the First Amendment side, we have Reed v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
Reed v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Sup. 2006) (quoting Sosna), aff’d, 841 N.Y.S.2d 469 (N.Y.A.D. 2007); Power v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 11:58 am
Panel: The Digital Future Coalition Seth D. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
Today we have a guest post (her second - she's a glutton for punishment) from fellow Reed Smith associate Danielle Devens. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 11:30 am
W. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
ROYSTON, RAYZOR, VICKERY, & WILLIAMS, LLP v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 12:00 am
The medal has been bestowed on people like Herbert Hoover, John D. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 10:14 am
In the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, the authors of the epidemiology chapter advance instances of acceleration of onset of disease as an example of a situation in which reliance upon doubling of risk will not provide a reliable probability of causation calculation[1]. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 5:33 am
Feldman, Partner, Reed Smith LLP: ads have been considered deceptive for not disclosing they are ads/source. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 3:45 pm
W. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 2:43 pm
Paul W. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 7:49 am
Penn just instituted this policy in response, but 16 Penn Law faculty members wrote this open letter criticizing aspects of that policy, and of the federal government’s actions, and I thought I’d pass it along: Sexual assault complaints: protecting complainants and the accused students at universities In response to guidelines issued by the U. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
Supp. 210 (D. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 12:16 pm
Reed (In re Angelle), 610 F.2d 1335, 1338-39 (5th Cir.1980). [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
Here on the Reed Smith side of the blog, three of our core contributors are located in Pennsylvania and California. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
This post is only from the Reed Smith (more properly, the non-Dechert) side of the blog.One hundred what, you say? [read post]
