Search for: "W. T. Grant Co., Matter of" Results 141 - 160 of 850
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 Most warnings concern a product’s use – that if you use (or don’t use) the product in a certain way, you are likely to get hurt; and if you follow the warning, you won’t. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
The then applicant mentioned in its letter of 10 October 2000 in the proceedings up to grant of the parent application, before the divisional application from which the patent in suit originated had been filed, that “both Mr De Vries and Mr Mooij were bound to a non-disclosure agreement pertaining to the subject-matter of the present European Patent application” […]. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:03 am by Andrew Frisch
  The Court below granted Plaintiffs, helicopter pilots employed by Defendants, summary judgment, holding that, as a matter of law, helicopter pilots are not exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) under the so-called “learned professional” exemption. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 6:06 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Ajac Transmission Parts Corp., 911 F.2d 363, 365 n. 2 (9th Cir. 1990); Lindy Pen Co. v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 7:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  In 2017, the FDA granted approval of Goprelto’s New Drug Application, which required five clinical trials and ten non-clinical trials involving over 700 human subjects. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 3:25 am by Peter Mahler
The choice of name for a new restaurant, or any start-up for that matter, is a critical branding decision with potentially great impact on the business’s goodwill value. [read post]
27 May 2012, 7:10 am by Jeralyn
W-1 and W-2 are sisters who didn't see anything. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 2:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Seim letter, published a few days later, said: Regarding the lovely picture of our local baseball snatcher … [w]ouldn't it be more useful to follow the wise practice of omitting a perpetrator's name and image when reporting "crimes," so as not to create much-desired notoriety? [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 2:14 am
Nott, 62 F.3d 287, 293 (9th Cir.1995)( "By itself, § 1988 does not provide the district court with jurisdiction to grant an attorney fee award where subject matter jurisdiction to hear the underlying § 1983 claim is lacking. [read post]