Search for: "WILLIAMS v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS" Results 141 - 160 of 554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2018, 9:00 pm by Dan Flynn
Chief Executive Officer Stewart Parnell’s sentence was for 28 years; Michael, his peanut broker brother, got 20 years; and Wilkerson, PCA’s quality control manager, got five. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am by Margaret Taylor
The first type—an assertion of presidential communications privilege—represents the core of executive privilege that was first recognized in U.S. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
The recommendation prompted a dissent by a representative from the Attorney General=s Office. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 7:30 am by Michelle Onibokun, Chuck Rosenberg
This is particularly concerning in light of Attorney General William Barr’s hints that the department may, in advance of the 2020 election, release material from U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, January 09, 2008 US v. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 6:57 am by David Post
This is particularly so because, insofar as interim United States Attorneys are concerned, the Executive Branch holds all the trump cards. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 2:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Fighting over money is the domain of attorneys, it can be dirty, and seemingly without rules and has been for centuries. in U.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In Office of Legal Counsel opinions, the Korea War essentially shrank the constitutional concept of war – so that anything smaller than that catastrophic war did not require Congressional authorization.[5]For example, Assistant Attorney General William Rehnquist relied on the Korean War in an OLC memo supporting President Richard Nixon’s power to invade Cambodia. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Many news analysts seem dubious, based on the fact that similar arguments were rejected by the U.S. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 8:40 am by Kia Rahnama
On May 6, the House Judiciary Committee voted to recommend that Attorney General William Barr be held in contempt of Congress for his refusal to provide the committee with an unredacted version of the special counsel’s report. [read post]