Search for: "Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Matter of" Results 141 - 160 of 468
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2015, 8:53 am
Council 82, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v Cuomo, 64 NY2d 233, 240 [1984]; Matter of Adirondack Council, Inc. v Adirondack Park Agency, 92 AD3d 188, 191 [2012]; Matter of Wal-Mart Stores v Campbell, 238 AD2d 831, 832-833 [1997]). [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:27 pm by Gerald L. Maatman, Jr.
Wal-Mart Stores is one of the most closely watched cases in years given the stakes for employers in employment discrimination class actions. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:27 pm by Gerald L. Maatman, Jr.
Wal-Mart Stores is one of the most closely watched cases in years given the stakes for employers in employment discrimination class actions. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 6:00 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
  As you may recall, he did a previous guest post regarding the Louisiana Supreme Court’s decision to adopt the Wal-Mart v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 8:18 am by Susan Schneider
 Our appreciation is extended to these two busy professionals for taking time out of their schedules to visit with us.Don Wiseman serves as senior associate general counsel at Wal-Mart Stores Inc. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:33 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 572F.3d 677, 681 (9th Cir. 2009) (“Contract interpretation isa question of law that we review de novo. [read post]
28 May 2008, 9:44 am
As reported last year by the American Lawyer: Over the last few years, Wal-Mart Stores Inc., and others have raised the stakes for outside counsel, pressing firms to increase diversity in their ranks or risk losing clients. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 9:12 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 240 F.3d255, 259 (4th Cir. 2001); Price v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 10:12 am by John Jascob
The EZCORP court held that subsequent shareholders are not precluded until a derivative complaint overcomes a motion to dismiss or the board declines to oppose the litigation (In re Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
30 May 2014, 10:12 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Implications For Employers This case is another interesting decision in the line of cases interpreting Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 7:27 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
On appeal, Tyson Foods argued that plaintiffs’ use of averaging constituted impermissible “trial by formula” under Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 11:29 pm
Here is the proposal from Wal-Mart's proxy statement, which was filed earlier this week with the SEC: Resolved, that the shareholders of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
 The trial court originally certified an “off-the-clock” class, but granted Allstate’s motion for decertification after the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:46 am
Mass. 2005) (denying motion to compel inspection where “any benefit from the inspection ... is outweighed by the burdens that such inspection will impose”). 18 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 10:39 am by Chad Bray
Supreme Court is expected to hear arguments in a closely watched 2001 lawsuit on behalf of as many 1.5 million female employees at Wal-Mart Stores Inc. [read post]