Search for: "Young v. SEC" Results 141 - 160 of 305
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Feds – Denver lawyer Jack Luellen of Fox Rothschild on the firm’s blog, Energy Law Today Breaking News: Executive Order Signed Relating to “Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities” – Boston lawyer Cynthia LaRose of Mintz Levin on the firm’s blog, Privacy & Security Matters What Connecticut Employers Need To Know About Young v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 3:26 am by Broc Romanek
Recently, I blogged about how the China-based affiliates of the Big 4 (Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, Ernst & Young, KPMG and PwC) settled SEC administrative charges by each paying $500k and admitting that prior to the commencement of the agency’s enforcement proceedings, they didn’t provide the SEC with the work papers for audits conducted for US companies. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 4:01 am by Broc Romanek
– the SEC announced that the China-based affiliates of the Big 4 (Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, Ernst & Young, KPMG and PwC) settled SEC administrative charges by each paying $500k and admitting that prior to the commencement of the agency’s enforcement proceedings, they didn’t provide the SEC with the work papers for audits conducted for US companies. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 8:25 am by James Hamilton
Title V of the Act is the Swap Data Repository and ClearinghouseIndemnification Correction Act. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:13 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
: 3-15986Case filed: July 28, 2014Qualifying Judgment/Order: July 28, 2014 08/21/2014 11/19/2014 2014-88 SEC v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Supreme Court issued its opinion in Lane v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:17 am by Joy Waltemath
Finding that an employer did not breach policy or union agreements by laying off a long-time African-American employee and keeping less senior but more versatile workers, and finding that the mere fact that workers retained in the layoff were in the employee’s same wage group was not enough to show they were similarly situated, an Eighth Circuit panel affirmed summary judgment on the employee’s race discrimination and retaliation claims under Sec. 1981 (Young v… [read post]