Search for: "marko milanovic"
Results 141 - 160
of 176
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2014, 12:00 pm
As Ashley Deeks has noted, the U.S. is almost alone in the international community in arguing that the ICCPR does not apply extraterritorially (see Marko Milanovic for further analysis). [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:31 am
The Court could have done one of several things (see Marko Milanovic’s post at EJIL:Talk): - It could nevertheless have ‘read down’ the UN obligations even in Mr Nada’s case. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 6:55 am
Marko Milanovic teased out some interesting results from a recent international poll on public attitudes toward government surveillance. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:50 am
Marko Milanovic analyzed recently published survey data from Amnesty International, focusing on how citizenship bias affects public perceptions of the acceptability of government surveillance of foreigners. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:51 am
We can see from commentaries by Marko Milanovic and Alasdair Henderson that the ECtHR seems to have conflated two previously separate means of establishing extraterritorial application of the Convention without actually explaining satisfactorily how it reached that conclusion. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 1:35 pm
Marko Milanovic points out in the comments that there will be a professional bias in the program toward the three-articles option: whereas students will be able to publish articles before going on the job market in the third year, that will not be the case for a book. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:09 am
K 3240 M55 2011 Extraterritorial application of human rights treaties : law, principles, and policy Marko Milanovic. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 6:19 am
-ASIL discussion of Marko Milanovic’s book. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 10:52 am
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Marko Milanovic shared his thoughts on the British Parliament’s recently released report, entitled, “Privacy and Security: A Modern and Transparent Legal Framework. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:31 am
The Court could have done one of several things (see Marko Milanovic's post at EJIL:Talk):- It could nevertheless have 'read down' the UN obligations even in Mr Nada's case. [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:42 pm
Marko Milanovic. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 12:53 pm
Thanks to Marko Milanovic (EJIL: Talk!) [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:58 am
In times of uncertainty and anxiety, it’s always nice for some people to have someone to blame. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 10:01 am
” Marko Milanovic has argued, however, that Iran's missile strikes were illegal under international law since any strikes that are purely retaliatory in nature are unlawful under the UN Charter. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:23 am
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued a unanimous order on Oct. 3 indicating limited provisional measures against the United States. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 1:58 pm
U.S. officials have denied Syrian accusations that U.S. coalition planes targeted a Syrian military base, and instead asserted that Russia was responsible for the strikes that killed four Syrian soldiers and wounded at least 13 others. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:47 am
Marko Milanovic has highlighted on the EJIL: Talk blog how parts of the policy contained in the top-secret document was outlined with the help of careful and well crafted legal advice. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 6:55 am
Marko Milanovic highlighted some interesting aspects of a new report issued by the British Parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC), the body tasked with overseeing the GCHQ, a British intelligence and surveillance agency. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 6:02 pm
The criticism of the ECHR’s decision has been so vehement (Marko Milanovic and Tatjana Papic entitle their scathing article “As Bad as it Getsâ€), that when the ILC added commentary to its draft articles this past summer it made clear the ECHR had misapplied its principles and included a long footnote citing to the critical literature (including the Milavoic and Papic piece (p. 67 n. 102)). [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 4:26 am
Marko Milanovic, Professor of Public International Law at the University of Nottingham School, responded to his remarks. ● Failure in the Marketplace of Ideas: Censorship and Impeachment. [read post]
