Search for: "v. " Results 141 - 160 of 491,757
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2011, 6:48 am by scanner1
UNINSURED EMPLOYERS’ FUND, Respondent/Third-Party Petitioner and Appellee, v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 7:41 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The dissent in Eplus v Lawson is of significant interest. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 2:35 am by traceydennis
Ahmed and others v HM Treasury (JUSTICE intervening); al-Ghabra v Same; R (Youssef) v Same “In introducing a test of reasonable suspicion that a person was involved in terrorism as the basis for making an asset-freezing order against him under the Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Order 2006 the Treasury exceeded its powers under the enabling provisions of s 1 of the United Nations Act 1946. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:47 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
The post Case Preview: Hook v British Airways and Stott v Thomas Cook appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 8:32 am
R v Freeman; R v Crawford [2008] EWCA Crim 1863; [2008] WLR (D) 287 “Some care was required in directing a jury when approaching the cross-admissibility of bad character evidence. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 2:19 am
Copley v Lawn; Maden v Haller Court of Appeal “An offer by a negligent driver's insurers to a claimant of a free replacement car while repairs were being done had to make clear to the claimant the cost to the defendant of hiring the car. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:34 am
Copley v Lawn; Maden v Haller [2009] EWCA Civ 580; [2009] WLR (D) 200 “Where, following a road accident caused by a defendant's negligence, the defendant's insurers offered to provide a ‘free’ replacement car to the claimant while his own car was being repaired, the claimant could reasonably reject or ignore the offer if it did [...] [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 2:55 am
R v Erskine; R v Williams  [2009] EWCA Crim 1425; [2009] WLR (D) 241 “Where an appeal against a conviction for murder raised the issue of diminished responsibility for the first time, the parties should provide the court with a detailed analysis of the relevant facts in order to assist the court in deciding whether evidence not [...] [read post]