Search for: "Branch v. Mays" Results 1581 - 1600 of 5,714
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2021, 4:01 am by Administrator
Core policy decisions are immune from negligence liability because each branch of government has a core institutional role and competency that must be protected from interference by the other branches. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 12:45 am by INFORRM
In Galloway v William Frederick Frazer, Google Inc t/a YouTube and others, Mr Justice Horner in the High Court of Northern Ireland refused an application by Google Inc. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:44 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
Circuit’s failure to articulate and apply a standard for detention of the Guantánamo prisoners that places any meaningful limits on the Executive Branch’s detention authority. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 11:28 am by John Bellinger
”)  The Second Circuit panel rejected the plaintiffs’ arguments that courts are not required to defer to Executive branch SoIs and that there is, or should be, a jus cogens exception to official acts immunity, holding that it was bound by the Circuit’s prior decision in Matar v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 2:39 pm
  (The lead case in that appeal will be Bismullah v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 5:16 am by Máiréad Enright
Related PostsOctober 17, 2011 -- UNHCR #do1thing: Subsidiary Protection (0)May 23, 2011 -- S & Another v MJELR and Safeguarding Marriage. (1) [read post]
31 May 2011, 7:11 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 7,890,648 entitled AUDIOVISUAL PRESENTATION WITH INTERACTIVE SEAMLESS BRANCHING AND/OR TELESCOPIC ADVERTISING and owned by MONKEYmedia. [read post]