Search for: "Cal Law"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 14,615
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2008, 12:40 pm
Brendlin, 2008 Cal. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 12:08 pm
LEXIS 811 (Cal. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 1:29 pm
He's going to die in prison regardless, or (if he's lucky) get compassionate release shortly before he dies.But, hey, at least we eventually got the law right. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:02 pm
The only exception to these sanctions permitted Father to 'cross-examine medical professionals, representatives of Child Protective Services[,] and representatives of law enforcement agencies.' Father concedes these sanctions were 'imminently reasonable.'"Since it's a family law case (and one in which the trial court found that Father repeatedly molested the kids), I can't find most of the briefs online. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 12:15 am
Natomas Company, 208 Cal. [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 12:15 am
Cal. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 12:33 pm
Cal. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm
., 34 Cal. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:17 am
I was somewhat surprised to see a pro per litigant in family law court hearing in Placer County use the words "moot," "adjudicated" and "precluded. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 8:21 am
Iskanian is represented by Capstone Law APC). [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:20 pm
Here's a family law case. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 1:29 pm
"In response to another hypothetical, [Officer Krish testified that] a person in a gang would still be a gang member, even if he or she moved away from the area, got a bachelor's degree, went to law school and became a lawyer, and returned to the neighborhood to play basketball and drink beers with other gang members." [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 11:04 am
Think back for a moment to those heady days during your first year of law school, when you learned all about res judicata. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 2:30 pm
Jonathan Simon quoted in The Daily Californian, March 22, 2012 UC Berkeley School of Law professor Jonathan Simon said in an email that court-issued stay-away orders in general are “a very serious infringement of fundamental rights” and “should never be used unless a very credible threat exists,” but that they are “not uncommon” when there are [...] [read post]
11 May 2009, 6:37 am
A few weeks ago, I blogged about a case that held, among other things, that Labor Code Section 203 "waiting time" penalties are not available as restituation under the Unfair Competition Law. [read post]
12 May 2016, 1:04 pm
[Cite] The court notes the petition improperly cites unpublished case law. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 2:39 pm
Unknowingly having a temporary cache file in your computer may not count as 'possession' of child pornography in the federal system, but here in California, under state law, we say it does." [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:39 pm
In a decision that's both consistent with the law as well as entirely equitable.IMHO. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 9:51 am
Bank of America, in which the Court of Appeal held, among other things, that Labor Code Section 203 "waiting time" penalties are not available as restitution under the Unfair Competition Law. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 2:45 pm
It's got everything you need to know -- the facts, the law, the analysis -- and nothing you don't need to know.Exceptionally impressive.If brevity is the soul of wit, Justice Gilbert can serve as our modern day Polonius. [read post]
