Search for: "Free v. State" Results 1581 - 1600 of 35,729
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Sarah Friedman
On May 17, 1954, the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in Brown v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 5:15 pm by Lawrence Solum
Although a subsequent Supreme Court decision negated federal common law some states adopted the misappropriation doctrine from International News Service under state unfair competition law. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by Amanda L. Tyler
On Dec. 11, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia heard arguments in ACLU v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:10 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Yesterday, we filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the Supreme Court in a case called United States Agency for International Development v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am by Elizabeth Prochaska, Matrix Chambers.
Not since R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53 (where foreign nationals were required to obtain the Secretary of State’s permission to get married) has there been such an obvious case of a disproportionate immigration measure. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am by Elizabeth Prochaska, Matrix Chambers.
Not since R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53 (where foreign nationals were required to obtain the Secretary of State’s permission to get married) has there been such an obvious case of a disproportionate immigration measure. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 4:41 am
The former seems to be a claim to be free from an extraordinary imposition on conscience. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 10:48 am by Karen Breda
  This amazing legal linguistics resource was recently cited by Justice Thomas in his dissent to Carpenter v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 5:20 pm by Aurora Barnes
Dulles Duty Free, LLC 17-904 Issues: (1) Whether the validity under the import-export clause of a non-discriminatory local business license tax calculated on the basis of gross receipts should be evaluated using the Supreme Court’s approach in Michelin Tire Corp. v. [read post]