Search for: "In re: Roger" Results 1581 - 1600 of 3,496
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2014, 5:20 am by Amy Howe
Dan Tarlock for ISCOTUSnow (video), Richard Re at Re’s Judicata, and Andrew M. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 9:14 pm by Walter Olson
Circuit Judge Stephen Williams commenting and Cato’s Roger Pilon moderating (video, podcast links). [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 7:00 am by Tara Hofbauer
Steve Vladeck objected to some aspects of John’s piece, though, stating, “I was a bit surprised to find . . . an effort to re-litigate the objections of . . . [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Trademark Misperceptions Revealed By Reaction to Redskins Decision – Boston lawyer Deborah Peckham of Burns & Levinson on the firm’s blog, Lex Indicium SEC Announces Major Fines In First Pay-to-Play Enforcement Case – Washington, DC lawyer Zachary Parks of Covington & Burling on their blog, InsidePoliticalLaw Fee-shifting bylaw proposal moved to the back burner pending further investigation – Fort Lauderdale lawyer Gustav Schmidt of Gunster on the firm’s blog,… [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
“I’m not sure we’re good at recognizing it in ourselves because we’re too busy looking after others,” she says. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:20 pm by azatty
Regina Nassen If you represent government entities, whether you’re privately or publicly employed, you will find this presentation useful. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 1:52 pm by Keith L. Miller
  Decision: In re Roger Lee Shoss   ___________________________________________________________________________________________ If you believe that you or your company has suffered damages as the result of the negligent conduct of a lawyer, contact Boston Legal Malpractice Lawyer, Keith L. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 11:02 am by April Glaser
And tell the FCC: it’s our Internet, and we’re going to fight to protect it. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 8:13 am by Glo
Commentary: This is one of those accidents that may look like it has an open-and-shut fact pattern, when in reality, there is always a fight when we’re talking about a commercial freight company. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:11 pm by Dan Harris
It’s up to me to make sure they’re making informed decisions. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm by Guest Blogger
Kristin CollinsThis post is part of an online symposium discussing Nicholas Parrillo, Against the Profit Motive: The Salary Revolution in American Government, 1780-1940 (Yale University Press 2013).The history of nineteenth-century American administrative law is in the midst of a revival, and Nicholas Parrillo’s book Against the Profit Motive is an important contribution to this growing body of scholarship. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 11:18 am by Venkat Balasubramani
(Wagner filed another similar looking lawsuit that was remanded to state court by Judge Gonzalez Rogers. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:01 pm by Lydia Zuraw
Hal Rogers (R-KY), initially rejected the amendment based on a voice vote, but a roll-call vote resulted in 28-22 in favor. [read post]
27 May 2014, 10:44 am
The bridge connects Woodall Rogers Freeway through downtown Dallas to Singleton Boulevard in west Dallas. [read post]
25 May 2014, 6:05 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
I don't know if you're reggie jackson. [read post]
18 May 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
., Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit 2014 http://t.co/YNRT6CVQ8c -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-05-14: Google looms as 'censor-in-chief' after ‘right to be forgott… http://t.co/3Hd3o8eBDU -> Google swamped by takedown requests after court ruling http://t.co/2LR9C5KTaR -> Politician and paedophile ask Google to 'be forgotten' http://t.co/xp4E72KNuZ -> One Court Ruling on Privacy in Europe, and 28 Regulators http://t.co/4dEGlpoH7V ->… [read post]
17 May 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Rogers explains why it came last in Netflix rankings http://t.co/c0tGfLBb6e -> Interes Actavis UK v Eli Lilly & Company [2014] EWHC 1511 http://t.co/1Cw5ucuStG – patent judgment dealing with multi-jurisdictional claims -> Appeal allowed- reasons to follow Canadian Artists’ Representation v. [read post]