Search for: "In re P. F."
Results 1581 - 1600
of 4,148
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2016, 3:29 pm
ASCAP and BMI, for their part, wasted no time in broadcasting their next moves: they announced that they would “[j]oin [f]orces to [f]ight” DOJ’s interpretation. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 5:16 am
[P]arents must be afforded every procedural and substantive protection the law allows. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 5:22 pm
The most common Salmonella serogroups are A, B, C, D, E, F, and G. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 8:06 am
Interestingly, she links to a 1997 memo that recommended FDA re-examine its 60-day aging process for hard cheeses made from raw milk. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 10:56 am
. *********** [1] In re Transient Occupancy Tax Cases (City of San Diego v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 2:59 pm
The Liberals re-introduced card-check but only for the construction sector. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm
Yet it represents a highly influential idea about what equity means—equity is about the exceptional case, the unforeseen circumstance, the extension of a law to a case that is within its spirit but not quite within its letter.[2] This sense of equity can be seen in William Blackstone’s description of “equitable interpretation” of a statute: [I]f the parliament will positively enact a thing to be done which is unreasonable, I know of no power in the ordinary forms of… [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 11:18 am
For example, here's Judge Rosenbaum citing one of the great all-time TV shows in In Re: Charles Clayton:Imagine a sentencing guideline that read, “A defendant is a career offender if ‘[p]uddles do not ask for why not? [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:17 pm
May became Prime Minister, she said that she would pursue the following actions if she were to become Prime Minister: Put consumers and employees on boards of directors: “[I]f I’m Prime Minister, we’re going to change [the] system – and we’re going to have not just consumers represented on company boards, but employees as well. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:22 am
(Noyan, at p. 672.)People v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 11:09 am
Hubbard, 775 F.3d 1118, 1125 (9th Cir. 2014). [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 6:20 am
This post examines an opinion from the California Court of Appeal – Fourth District: In re M.H., 2016 WL 3541185 (2016). [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Ce faisant, il incorpore clairement, par cette référence explicite, les effets des articles 2, 4 et 6 du règlement, lesquels prévoient que de telles manifestations sont interdites et mettent en danger la paix, la sécurité ou l’ordre publics. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 4:05 am
La APF es la organización profesional que reúne y representa el mayor número de Fisioterapistas y Asistentes del Fisioterapista en el país. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
P. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am
Promega Corporation, No. 14-1538 (whether an entity can “induce itself” under 271(f)(1))(CVSG, awaiting government brief) 2. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:09 am
We're slamming someone on the open forum that is the internet. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 7:21 pm
Cir.2006); In re Sullivan, 362 F.3d 1324, 1328 (Fed. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
F. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:45 am
” In re Delta/AirTran Baggage Fee Antitrust Litig., 846 F. [read post]
