Search for: "MATTER OF INQUIRY INTO M M" Results 1581 - 1600 of 2,737
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2013, 7:16 am by Joy Waltemath
” On the other side, the NOD’s Glazer says, “[m]any of the employers NOD works with, most of whom are federal contractors, have set their disability hiring goals in certain locales at 10 percent. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
On appeal, that order was quashed and the matter was sent back for rehearing. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 6:52 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employer and union group health plan sponsors and insurers of group and individual health plans (Health Plans) agonizing over 2014 plan design decisions are running out of time. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:51 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
” (I’m not sure I fully get this—why wouldn’t the Sherman Act be preempted only to the extent it imposed non-identical requirements? [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 11:34 am by Orin Kerr
I’m not sure there is a doctrinal answer to that issue, but the white paper doesn’t appear to acknowledge and confront the question. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 4:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  I’m in full agreement with these points—as to the last, here’s how the court summarizes its decision: “Under the ‘transformative use’ test developed by the California Supreme Court, EA’s use does not qualify for First Amendment protection as a matter of law because it literally recreates Keller in the very setting in which he has achieved renown” (emphasis added). [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 8:40 am by Carole (Staff Lawyer)
You might recognize some of the cases:  Travis Vader (the McCann disappearance); Travis Baumgartner (the G4S shooting) and the Baby M case. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 6:10 am by Mark Summerfield
IP Australia is seeking views on further proposed amendments to the Australian Patents Act 1990, which arise out of three enquiries into gene patents and the scope of patentable subject matter in Australia. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 6:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” (It can’t really “mirror” it, or the two inquiries are duplicative. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm by Steve Sady
And what does it matter if the defendant’s conduct matched the predicate crime regardless of the technical details of the conviction? [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm by Venkat
The court says these notices don’t matter, because Fung had “red flag” knowledge of a “broad range of infringing activity. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:02 pm by Kevin Goldberg
And now is an excellent time to do so because a number of important changes to the law are set to take effect on July 1, 2013.I’ll address the five changes that I think are among the most important below, but be advised that I’m only scratching the surface. [read post]