Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 5,962
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2019, 6:49 am
"[C]orn cakes and rice cakes are the species, not the genus. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:56 am
Even if the mark did misdescribe the goods, the Board found that the second and third prongs were not met. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:46 pm
As of Sept. 24, the House of Representatives has formally launched impeachment proceedings against President Trump. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 1:52 pm
” Nor was it bad faith to continue using PELOTON after receiving the C&D. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:21 pm
Bergsman, Cynthia C. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 10:37 am
” And simply because a public figure sells goods or services shouldn’t give it an advantage over public figures that don’t. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 7:18 am
Good-Bye Punitive Damages Without compensatory damages there can’t be punitive damages. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:01 am
July 2, 2019); see also Marks v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 12:24 pm
It must do so on the basis of factors such as the details about the geographical areas where the products were to be delivered.AMS Neve Ltd and others v Heritage Audio SL and others (Case C-172/18) EU:C:2019:674 [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
This refusal was just the denial of a benefit; no-one was being threatened with jail or fines for using the name—owners of this mark were just not being given access to certain useful remedies against those who would infringe the mark. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 11:28 am
Challender & Douglas C. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 8:30 am
In the specific case, with regard to the clothing sector, the CJEU recognized that it is usual to place a mark on both the exterior of the goods and the labels sewn on the inside of them. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 5:59 pm
15 U.S.C. 1117(b)-(c). [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 10:20 am
The laws that control these benefits are found at MGL c. 152. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 7:25 am
What good is this information? [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 1:16 am
As to whether Viridis had a justification for its non-use of BOSWELAN, the CJEU reiterated that proper reasons for non-use must be independent of the will of the proprietor of the mark, have a sufficiently direct relationship with the mark, and be of such a nature as to make the use of the mark impossible or unreasonable ( see C-246/05, Häupl). [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 11:10 pm
It's a very good screen. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 6:31 pm
The claim is valueless to C, because it is time-barred and doesn’t arise out of the same transaction as C’s debt to B. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
For marks with many classes of goods and services, cost of renewing the trademark under the new regime will be significant higher than prior to the changes. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:05 pm
Paul C. [read post]
