Search for: "P&P IMPORTS, INC." Results 1581 - 1600 of 3,313
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2015, 2:24 pm by Marty Lederman
Oceanic Contractors, Inc., 458 U.S. at 571, “in rare cases the literal application of a statute will produce a result demonstrably at odds with the intentions of its drafters, and those intentions must be controlling. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 11:46 am by Marty Lederman
  Because, he reasons (p.85), the program “is actually affirmative actionrather than inaction. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
P-6, (« Règlement P-6 »), pour « non-divulgation de l’itinéraire de la manifestation »…. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
  * "Fool's errand": no need to create your own brand if you can use someone else's Jeremy notes Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH [2015] EWCA Civ 54 [on which see earlier katpost here], a trade mark infringement decision of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales, on parallel importation and over-stickering of pharmaceutical products. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 12:56 pm
  Putting that rabbit in the hat is important in any analysis of the court’s discussion of Arizona’s comparative fault system. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Footnote 243 (p. 71) of the draft does not give due importance to Canada’s national standards system, in particular, recognition of the disciplining of the procedure used to obtain a proclamation by the Standards Council of Canada of draft standards sought to become National Standards of Canada. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
Now, Darren sinks his paws on the appeal decision in Hospira (UK) Ltd v Genentech, Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 57 (6 February 2015). [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:38 pm by Schachtman
Although settling scores with opposing expert witnesses can be a risky business[2], the practice can provide important insights for judges and lawyers who want to avoid the errors of the past. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm by Schachtman
Although settling scores with opposing expert witnesses can be a risky business[2], the practice can provide important insights for judges and lawyers who want to avoid the errors of the past. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:13 am by Gustavo Arballo
El fallo de Nueva York, dijo la Corte argentina, no satisface el requisito de orden público previsto en el art. 517, inc. 4 del Código Procesal Civil y Comercial de la Nación, en la pretensión del accionante implicaría convalidar que éste, a través de una acción individual promovida ante un tribunal extranjero, eludirá el proceso de reestructuración de la deuda pública dispuesto por el Estado… [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:54 pm by Schachtman
Salim Shah and his companies Sarfez Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Sarfez USA, Inc. [read post]