Search for: "People v. London"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 1,929
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2015, 4:50 pm
For the purpose of this exercise, no evidence of the meaning in which the words were in fact understood is admissible; such evidence is irrelevant – see, for instance, Goddard LJ in Hough v London Express [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
Because the district court entered a default judgment on liability, we treat it as conclusively established that Cenk Sidar raped Jane Doe in London in September 2017. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
Lord Rodger cites McHugh and Kirby JJ (High Court of Australia, Applicants S396/2002 and S395/2002 v. [read post]
27 Feb 2016, 1:01 am
(It turned out to be Camden London Borough Council.) [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 4:45 am
New London . [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm
” More than 43,000 people signed the campaign’s petition. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
In Yee v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 2:17 pm
In the courts R (on the application of MD (Afghanistan)) v. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm
The Media Blog examines the story of a ‘giant rat’ found in East London. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 12:44 am
Eric Heinze, Professor of Law & Humanities at the University of London; and Ourveena Geereesha Topsy-Sonoo, Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information in Africa, African Commission on Human and People’s Rights. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:29 pm
BrazilBig Pan Bakery v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 4:30 am
The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ RightWilliams v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm
Supreme Court on the Second Amendment to right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am
” Several weeks later, on July 18, Justice Elena Kagan appeared at Georgetown as well, where she recounted her memorable Kimble v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
[This is a version of a letter I sent to the Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property today to call attention to various discrepancies in the proposed witness list, especially the presence of the Pirate Party at a hearing at the world’s greatest deliberative body. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 5:04 pm
For example see Mr Justice King’s provisional view in NEJ v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 12:35 am
The case is Olson v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am
She appealed, and in Higgs v Farmor’s School [2023] EAT 89 the Appeal Tribunal ruled in her favour, at least provisionally. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Public Interest Defense The law of confidentiality is based on the principle that people who are entrusted with confidential information ought, as a general rule, to respect it. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]
