Search for: "Peters v. Doe" Results 1581 - 1600 of 3,581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm by Tommy Tobin
Food can — and all too often does — make people sick. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 5:24 pm by Ilya Somin
” The GOP plan, he explains, does mostly the latter, often even more inefficiently and coercively than Obamacare. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:16 am by Dennis Crouch
It has been held that taking discovery does not trigger a waiver, nor does proceeding to trial. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
The Crown Office said the report is still “under consideration” nearly four years on from when Police Scotland first referring the case to the Lord Advocate.JUDGE, SUSPENDED:Statement from the Judicial Office for Scotland on the suspension of part-time sheriff Peter WatsonSheriff Peter Watson was suspended from the office of part-time sheriff on 16 February 2015, in terms of section 34 of the Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
“The reasonable person”, wrote Justices Claire L’Heureux-Dubé and Beverley McLachlin in R. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Judge Brinkema rightly rejected this argument, citing the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in McCreary County v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 8:49 am by Jan von Hein
Peters: Pseudo-foreign Ltd., PLC and LLP: Limited in liability or rather in longevity? [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 11:32 am by Jordan Brunner
Peter Margulies examined Judge Gorsuch’s misplacement of his characteristic empathy in Kerns v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 11:14 am by Robichaud
As set out in the Factum of the Appellant (Groia) to the Law Society Appeal Tribunal:  The reviewing courts concluded that Justice Peter Hryn (“Justice Hryn” or the “trial judge”) had managed the trial patiently, even-handedly and with scrupulous judicial neutrality. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:48 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg BNA, Chris Marr looks at American Business USA Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” The Washington Post’s editorial board weighs in on Lee v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:11 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Div. 1972), where the court held that one does not need an expert witness to testify that the bed rails should have been in the up position for an elderly person who fell out of bed. [read post]