Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 4,115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Family law has seen a sharp increase in the number of self-represented litigants over the past few years. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 9:01 am
Compare the analogous decade-long battle in Enigma v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
The case name is Express Scripts, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 11:48 am
.* Storm in a C Cup: Mr Justice Carr refuses injunction and account of profits in Stretchline v H&M spatElettra Bietti (A&O) summarises for the Kat-readership the recent and unreported decision of Mr Justice Carr in the on-going Stretchline v H&M dispute [see previous posts here], which serves as a warning for all those who draft IP settlement agreements in the event of future infringements.* Pharmaceuticals, Fig Leaves and Accidental Overspill: the… [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 2:58 pm
Permission to appeal in patent cases - farewell to the Pozzoli approachGuest Kat Eibhlin Vardy recaps the case Teva UK Ltd v Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co KG, [2016] EWCA Civ 1296. [read post]
31 May 2021, 10:51 am
Sharp apparently took a similar position at some stage of its dispute with Daimler, pointing to an Avanci licensing offer as opposed to making its own.With two charts I'd like to show how German FRAND case law has spiraled out of control since Huawei v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., 807 N.W.2d 343, 347 (Mich. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 6:50 am
Sharp v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:45 am
Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ). [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
The Supreme Court rejected Sharp LJ’s findings that Mitting J had merely used a dictionary as check. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 1:14 pm
So let’s talk about Hamilton v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:20 pm
In today’s case (Dhah v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 4:08 pm
Third, in McRO Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:06 pm
In Golden v. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 5:56 am
See United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:41 am
Giordano v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 1:22 pm
See Underwager v. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 10:48 am
In summary those related to the failure to give sharp focus to the consequences of the disabilities, as demonstrated by the limited but unrealistic adaptations, and the failure to consider the principal needs of both children. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:02 am
The Court's opinion confirms the statements made by Justice Sharp of the Houston First District Court of Appeals in Samson Lone Star v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 4:30 am
Caudle v. [read post]
