Search for: "State California v. Superior Court" Results 1581 - 1600 of 3,616
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2007, 6:00 am
Finally, as to the manageability prong, the Court noted that courts in other states (notably, California and my firm's own Wal-Mart case, Savaglio v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:58 am by Lisa S. Charbonneau
California employers are subject to numerous state and federal statutes that regulate employee compensation and hours of work. [read post]
13 May 2013, 9:50 am by Sheppard Mullin
Superior Court, 51 Cal.4th 310, 323 (2011) (giving four examples of when restitution may be awarded under Section 17204); e.g., Korea Supply Co. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 8:48 am by Alex Lee
However, the agreement said nothing about what forum replaced the right to a jury trial, aside from a passing mention to the fact that the employee would pay the “then-current Superior Court of California filing fee towards the costs of the arbitration. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 8:48 am by Alex Lee
However, the agreement said nothing about what forum replaced the right to a jury trial, aside from a passing mention to the fact that the employee would pay the “then-current Superior Court of California filing fee towards the costs of the arbitration. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Superior Court, 42 Cal.4th 443 (2007) remains viable law post-AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 1:59 pm by Gina Reif Ilardi and Molly Masenga
Discussing this standard, the California Supreme Court, in Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:45 am by Paul Rosner
”[7]      Citing a California Court of Appeal decision,Haskel, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 2:43 pm by Unknown
United States (Trust Relationship; Mineral Leasing) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html Ahtna, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court unanimously held in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 5:00 am by zshapiro
A couple of days ago we reported on People v. [read post]